I've had a number of people ask what I thought about the victory of Barack Hussein Obama over John McCain. Not that I'm special -- people all over the country are asking each other what they think it all means.
While I got caught up in the moment (I'm a sucker for emotional manipulation, which is one reason I avoid most movies), I kept a distance from the frenzy of excitement that filled the Internet and airwaves last night and today.
Yes, the images of Grant Park in Chicago streamed around the world might themselves do more to regain our international standing as a beacon of hope, of a shining example of a county that prizes and makes possible individual accomplishment regardless of color or creed. Yes, the emotional content of Obama's blackness is in itself meaningful (although I understand why, it irks me that his designation always has to focus on his black side, and I'm looking forward to a day when it is no more noteworthy than his whiteness).
But to me, the real meaning of Obama's election is that it is a chance, not the thing itself. He said it best himself in his acceptance speech, first in a call to action that included everyone:
Even as we celebrate tonight, we know the challenges that tomorrow will bring are the greatest of our lifetime -- two wars, a planet in peril, the worst financial crisis in a century.
… Above all, I will ask you to join in the work of remaking this nation, the only way it's been done in America for 221 years -- block by block, brick by brick, calloused hand by calloused hand.
Then, what I believe to be the key statement:
This victory alone is not the change we seek. It is only the chance for us to make that change. And that cannot happen if we go back to the way things were. It can't happen without you, without a new spirit of service, a new spirit of sacrifice.
There, he said it -- sacrifice. Without injecting partisanship, one thing that I never understood during President George W. Bush's tenure was his approach to the war in Iraq. By God, if we're in a war, let's sacrifice. He told us to shop.
I'm willing to sacrifice. I'll drive less. I'll compromise some of my ideas to work with well-meaning people who have other ideas. I'll pay a little more in taxes, if I'm seeing results.
Obama's victory can be a moment in time that proves nothing more than yet another spectacle, a political Super Bowl, or it can be a pivot point. Republicans have good ideas. Democrats have good ideas. Let's fight it out, honestly and transparently, with the behind-door lobbying kept to a minimum, and let's speak bluntly about the challenges we face and the options we have.
We've been blessed with a bountiful planet, and as U.S. citizens, a nation of plenty and of plentiful opportunity. We have been charged by God to be good stewards.
What struck me and hopefully everyone else watching and talking and listening last night and this morning is the opportunity to raise our level of stewardship, and not only because of Obama. McCain gave a gracious and stirring concession speech, and Bush's remarks this morning displayed a humbleness and subservience to the needs of the country. Taken together, three of the most important U.S. political figures spent last night and this morning delivering a charge to the nation -- let's take up the challenge together.
I call myself a naïve cynic. In that spirit, I will permit myself the audacity to hope this is possible.
***
Sito Negron is editor of Newspaper Tree.















David K
November 5, 2008
Don't worry, you won't be asked to sacrifice. Your employer maybe. Your rich uncle, probably.
The good news for you is that the class warfare is the next big event for America.
You didn't notice the parts in his speech where he indicated that he may not be able to accomplish all his goals in just four years? Yeah, the dude is already campaigning for a second term.
Ron Stewart
November 5, 2008
If President Obama can begin correcting the mistaken idea that free market growth and consumption of material goods is to be worshiped over sharing the joys of creative arts and intellectual pursuits, I'll be content.
Richard B
November 5, 2008
And we thought David K was whiny when his party was in power, I suppose this is just a preview of the insights he'll be providing throughout the coming Dem administration. I'm sure in his mind he'll be a mighty warrior in the class war he's itching for, and I hope the wealthy appreciate his efforts on their behalf.
David Marcus
November 5, 2008
David K.....Read the tax and economic plans and understand them before you blog.....we didn't have class warfare in the 90's...why now? The tax plans Obama proposed put people earning over $250,000 a year at basically the same rates they paid in the nineties....it didn't create a crisis then, and it won't now.
I had my son Joe who worked on the Obama campaign in Denver text messaging us all night, and at the end, he and others with him were beyond emotional - they were in tears. Its hard to remember any Americans feeling so hopeful that they wanted to party well into the night.
And all I could think of to say to them was - Wow! Never dreamed this would come about in my lifetime.
But I also cautioned them to remember things won't be fixed overnight, or even over the next four years - I imagine our economy, our two wars, and Islamic terrorists will still be haunting us ten years from now...but perhaps by then, under Pres Elect Obama's leadership we'll see the light at the end of the tunnel. I voted for George Bush in 2000..and in 2004. His leadership turned out to be a mistake. A bad one.
We have a lot of work to do to repair our world....I hope it happens sooner than I predict...I'm so tired of all the bad news.
David Marcus
Marcus, Fairall, Bristol + Co, LLP
Certified Public Accountants
mike g
November 5, 2008
What is John McCains middle name? And why was it omitted at the top of the article? Is he trying to hide something?
MW
November 5, 2008
Very insightful, poignant piece.
David K
November 6, 2008
David Marcus,
Bush cut taxes and we saw the largest growth in the history of our economy. You can not argue with the numbers.
Your understanding of economics is very limited, I understand that.
In the 90's we had severe class warfare as we do now.
By raising taxes on the people who provide the capital for this country will urge them to spend less and make less. You see, you tax things you want people to stop doing. When you tax the rich they are going to stop investing, stop lending for profit and they may just take their money elsewhere. Who are you going to beg for money from then?
Taxing success is a sure fire way to kill - success.
At your age you should knows the common principles.
MaryP
November 6, 2008
To David Marcus - with all due respect your statement that those making $250,000 in the 90s didn't suffer because of the tax rates - we didn't face the type of financial crises we have today and I still didn't like the tax rates in the 90s. Did you forget the recession in 1999? The high unemployment? The dot.com bust? Since the 90s there are millions of people who have left the world of corporate America and started their own businesses. There isn't a single person in our 535 person Congress that has any idea how small business in America works. They are clueless and it doesn't matter what party they belong to. Obama's business tax policies and health care policies will only drive small business owners out of business, or cause them to seriously downsize their workforce and pass tax increases on to their customers. Tell me what is so smart about taxing the hell out of business and putting more unfunded mandates on business and then expecting them to hire people, pay them great salaries and provide superior benefits. Do you counsel your clients to "share the wealth", pay the tax and be happy to participate in this get something for nothing platform of Obama's? We are an instant solution society. We want an answer now, a solution now and we don't want to wait. Obama has very little time to fix the economy and if he doesn't , look for his approval ratings to be at the level of Bush's within one year of taking office.
David K
November 6, 2008
Just throwing this out there. If my accountant were a faming liberal who was FOR higher taxes I'd be very worried.
That's not something I'd admit out loud to your clients.
Jess O
November 6, 2008
Nice words Sito, and well spoken.
They had 8 years to do it their way.
Let's give President Obama a chance to try it another way.
With Bu$h we got war, economic disaster, job loss, massive government spending, and hatred from a world that fears us. We got terrorist attacks, an army stuck in the sand and a failing dollar. Every family in America earns less in real dollars than before the Bu$h disaster.
Class warfare is already happening- stealing billions from the taxpayers to give to big oil and investment bankers and tax breaks for the ultra-rich.
So maybe, maybe David K and the whiners can shut up for a second while the grown ups come to town and try to rebuild what their spoiled boy-king has ruined.
Sally Andrade
November 6, 2008
Perhaps Tom Friedman (NY TIMES 11-5-08) can help these desperately terrified readers understand what happened on November 4th? What a magnificent country and resilient democracy we are blessed to have!
"How did Obama pull it off? To be sure, it probably took a once-in-a-century economic crisis to get enough white people to vote for a black man. And to be sure, Obama’s better organization, calm manner, mellifluous speaking style and unthreatening message of “change” all served him well.
But there also may have been something of a “Buffett effect” that countered the supposed “Bradley effect” — white voters telling pollsters they’d vote for Obama but then voting for the white guy. The Buffett effect was just the opposite. It was white conservatives telling the guys in the men’s grill at the country club that they were voting for John McCain, but then quietly going into the booth and voting for Obama, even though they knew it would mean higher taxes.
Why? Some did it because they sensed how inspired and hopeful their kids were about an Obama presidency, and they not only didn’t want to dash those hopes, they secretly wanted to share them. Others intuitively embraced Warren Buffett’s view that if you are rich and successful today, it is first and foremost because you were lucky enough to be born in America at this time — and never forget that. So, we need to get back to fixing our country — we need a president who can unify us for nation-building at home.
And somewhere they also knew that after the abysmal performance of the Bush team, there had to be consequences for the Republican Party. Electing McCain now would have, in some way, meant rewarding incompetence. It would have made a mockery of accountability in government and unleashed a wave of cynicism in America that would have been deeply corrosive."
vato
November 8, 2008
Richard B:
"And we thought David K was whiny when his party was in power, I suppose this is just a preview.... I'm sure in his mind he'll be a mighty warrior in the class war he's itching for.....
No doubt he's planning his beer hall putsch at this moment, and then later he'll write more about 'His Struggle.'