Armando Rodriguez, who covered crime and the Juarez cartels for El Diario de Juarez, was killed in his car in front of his home as he prepared to take his daughter to school.
The killing, even in a year of extreme violence, shocked observers on both sides of the border.
"Armando had been working the police beat in Juarez for many years, and despite the fact that he worked in an environment that makes it very difficult to keep your integrity; he was an honest reporter who would never compromise his professionalism in exchange for money or safety for his family," said Elhiu Dominguez, a former reporter who now is the spokesman for the El Paso County Attorney's office. "It’s easy to assume that someone who gets killed in a very violent way was somehow involved with the drug cartels. Armando was not. I can only guess that he was killed because he knew too much about what is going on in Juarez."
What is going on in Juarez is a drug war that has killed more than 1,000 people since the beginning of the year. While the city has undergone spasms of violence before -- in the 1990s, for example, with the infamous 1997 Max-Fim massacre [link] and other killings, when Juarez Cartel leader Amado Carrillo Fuentes died and a power struggle ensued -- the scale of killings this year is beyond anything Juarez residents have seen.
In addition to the cartel wars, the violence has destabilized the community, leading to more street crime in general.
There was no immediate claim of responsibility, although his killing had the earmarks of a cartel hit -- the approach by a gunman, who shot him in the white Nissan given him by Diario, then fled to a waiting car. In addition, there were reports that Rodriguez had been threatened for his work.
El Diario de Juarez is the leading newspaper in Juarez, the fifth-largest city in Mexico. Diario issued the following statement, attributed to Pedro Torres , deputy editorial director of Diario: “This is not an attack against Diario; it is an attack against freedom of speech. We are going through a very sad moment with the death of Armando Rodriguez.” It was not clear from his recent stories what he might have been working on that would have made him a target.
Among his stories recently was coverage of the headless body strung from a Juarez overpass, one of the signs of out-of-control violence. The head of the body was left on the statue of a newsboy in the Plaza del Periodista – the Plaza of the Journalist. People, young and old, men and women, have been gunned down en masse in public places, and -- a la Iraq -- the cartels have taken to beheadings.
While Mexico is considered one of the most dangerous places in the world for reporters to work, Juarez had not seen such a high-profile murder (although police officials, usually working for or against the cartels, have been killed).
But, said Dominguez, who said he last spoke to Rodriguez a year ago, "The drug cartels in Juarez have been intimidating reporters as a way to control the flow of information put out by the media. I know many Juarez reporters who are afraid for their safety and are thinking about changing careers. Armando’s murder will send a chilling message to all of them."
Part of the reason is a word that is becoming a fixed part of the vocabulary whenever anyone speaks of Juarez -- impunity.
"I don’t have the slightest hope that the assassins will be caught, or that Armando's murder will be solved. To authorities, this will be just another murder, another number to add to the deadly statistics," Dominguez said.
The New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists, an international organization that tracks reporter safety throughout the world, issued a statement shortly after Rodriguez's death.
"We mourn the death of veteran crime reporter Armando Rodríguez and present our deepest condolences to friends and family," said Carlos Lauría, CPJ's senior program coordinator for the Americas. "The unprecedented wave of violence against the Mexican press must be halted immediately. We urge state and federal authorities to promptly investigate Rodríguez' slaying and bring those responsible to justice. Mexico needs to break the cycle of impunity in crimes against journalists."
The center logged four killings of journalists in Mexico prior to Rodriguez's death this morning:
-- Teresa Bautista Merino, La Voz que Rompe el Silencio, and Felicitas Martínez Sánchez, La Voz que Rompe el Silencio, April 7, 2008, Putla de Guerrero.
-- Alejandro Zenón Fonseca Estrada, EXA FM, Sept. 24, 2008, Villahermosa.
-- Miguel Angel Villagómez Valle, La Noticia de Michoacán, Oct. 10, 2008, between Lázaro Cárdenas and Zihuatanejo.
Zoltan Csanyi, news director for the Spanish-language KINT Channel 26, the only El Paso television newsroom with a full-time Juarez reporter, said that his station will continue to have a presence in the city.
"First of all, our prayers go out to the family of Armando Rodriguez, and our thoughts are with our colleagues at the Diario and with all the journalists across the border," Csanyi said. "We have told our Juarez reporter, who has covered news for Channel 26 for about 15 years, to use extreme caution while doing his job.
"Unfortunately, we have to cover the violence that’s happening and have done so on a daily basis, but our coverage has been and remains just reporting the facts of the story," he said. "We also cover other news that’s happening in Juarez, there are lot of positive stories, not just the violence."
Rodriguez was married and had three children, according to stories on the Diario Web site. He was born in 1968 in Camargo, Chihuahua, and moved to Juarez in 1986. He graduated from Universidad Autonoma de Chihuahua, Campus Cd. Juarez, with a degree in communications.
Rodriguez, an amateur cyclist known as "El Choco" among his friends and co-workers, worked for Canal 44, Canal 56, and Norte before hiring on at Diario in 1993.
He was very well known, and dozens of fellow journalists left comments on the Diario Web site about the killing. [link]
-- From Edgar Román, de Canal 44: “Considero que (la muerte de Armando Rodríguez) es un ataque al gremio periodístico. ‘Choco’ tenía muchos años en el medio periodístico y tenía muchos años de tratarlo. Es lamentable para su familia y para los medios." ("I consider the death of Armando Rodriguez an attack on the news and media community. Choco (Armando's nickname) had been in the media business for many many years and I personally got to know him. It is a very sad moment for his family and also for the news and media.")
-- From reporter Amado Meneses: "Descanse en paz un hombre bueno, esposo de una gran mujer y padre de niños bien educados y buenos como sus progenitores. Estos desgraciados ya le pegaron a las autoridades, a las escuelas, a las iglesias y ahora a la prensa ... no habrá qui los pare? Qué lameantable que estemos viviendo esta pesadilla." ("Rest in peace a great man, a great husband marrried to a great woman and the father of very well-educated and well-behaved children, just like their parents. These inhumane individuals have already hit authorities, schools, churches and now the press .... will anybody be able to stop them? It is a shame that we all are living this nightmare.")















diana
November 13, 2008
Sad case. ...
Richard/Westside
November 13, 2008
This makes you wonder how the secretary of tourism in Juarez still thinks that Juarez is safe for tourist. You have to be crazy to go to Juarez, especially if you have no family over there.
It is to bad that Juarez has become a war zone, I used to enjoy having dinner and taking my out-of-town guest to Juarez. I guess those days are over.
MR CK
November 13, 2008
The biggest draw to El Paso is Cd. Juarez. Now Cd. Juarez is becoming a war zone. Unfortunately, we in El Paso will pay a price.
BobB
November 13, 2008
The cartels can act with impunity against anyone, including people who know too much, or even if they just are spreading bad PR from the cartel's view. They way this is spiraling, the US is going to have to get involved because the Mexican's don't have the resources to do it.
DJ
November 13, 2008
My heart goes out to Rodriguez' family. How tragic, that someone who only wants to tell the truth is murdered by these eveil men. I'm afraid there is no end in sight for Juarez, and things can get a lot worse.
jack
November 13, 2008
Juarez is what happens when you don't have a valid second amendment. It so sad seeing people die and the Mexican govenrment will not let the people protect themselves. Its very very sad.
not jack
November 13, 2008
jack, please, take your political agenda elsewhere. what a ridiculous idea that somehow individual ownership of guns would make one bit of difference. people who want guns there have them, and in great quantities. juarez is what happens when you have a market, the united states, and a network to produce and/or get the product to market, and the government messes with the market, driving it underground. if you want to bring up some nutball right-wing agenda here, how about sticking with the premise that in a true capitalist, free-market system, the cartels would not exist to the extent they do because the market would not need their services.
licenciado
November 13, 2008
As Dr. Tony Payan of UTEP stated in news reports today, this murder was intended as a message to journalists to stop reporting their deeds. Journalists in smaller towns in Chihuahua have stopped reporting local murders in their newspapers for some time now. Murders, kidnappings, etc., in smaller towns are now only reported on blogs. The shooting in the presence of "Choco" Rodriguez' daughter was intended to outrage and frighten the journalist community of Cd. Juarez.
I now support an expansive interpretation of the Second Amendment in the U.S. I support it because of what I have seen taking place in Mexico. The violence and criminality is not just connected with the drug trade. The inability of law enforcement and the criminal justice system in Cd. Juarez to apprehend, prosecute, and convict but a few of those who are engaged in criminal activity has spawned the growth of an enormous cancer of numerous criminal organizations engaged in a wide range of criminal activity. Law enforcement is wholly ineffective. The Mexican people who are being victimized must be permitted their right under the Mexican Constitution to arm themselves and to shoot back at the criminals.
The cartels derive more than half of their income from marijuana consumers in the U.S. It is time to completely de-criminalize marijuana in the United States and throughout Latin America as a means of crippling the cartels. The cartels cannot operate without the tremendous amount of money that flows back into Mexico from their U.S. customers.
The war on drugs is not working. There are no reports that illegal drugs or marijuana are scarce in the United States. There are no reports that the price of illegal drugs or of marijuana has gone up because of a decrease in supply. The war on drugs is only serving to create choas South of the border.
rey/East Side
November 14, 2008
We now have a new president that has verbally during the campaign said little if anythingl about border issues. If he has, please let me know what he has said. Anyone?
We've (border communities) have been under siege with these two issues. (Illegal Immigration & the infiltration of Drugs to our Country) Have either parties provided or articulated a stategy?
Our Border Communites are shouldering the effects of a failed immigration and drug interdiction effort. Our Borders are a pourous and why? No fence or border/para miliatary involvement will prevent this flow of such a lucrative trade. We lack the resolve as a nation to admit that our Demand for drugs in inner cities and small town U.S.A. are the stimulus. You want a stimulus package? We're stimulating the Drug Factores quite well.
In our immigration policy, we're content going out to fancy hotels employing cheap labor, live in homes built by cheap labor, and we look the other way. We just want cheap! We've be Walmartized!
For those who say, they do know and admit this! What are they doing systemically? Other that hiring more Security personnel and creat a large agency (homeland security) OH! excuse me, the fence!
Perhaps with this Credit Meltdown, our leaders will get back to the people's business. Looking straight into the eyes of the tiger can bring on an urgency and a new found committement.
Whether you voted for our new president or not, his promises and attitude may embolden our representatives to get the peoples work done.
W'e've landing a increased Investment at Fort Bliss. Why not a comprehensive (sorry for the buzz word) plan to assist Mexico in this War on Drugs?
"Sometimes the Acorn lands on the head of the Squirrel"
See you
your consciousness
November 14, 2008
When guns are outlawed only outlaws will carry guns. Well, this is partially correct. If a few of those big shot drug dealers start getting gunned down, then possibly they will cool it on the streets. The only thing that will stop all this killing is a truce. Because drugs are illegal, we are seeing the exact same type of occurrences that happened when alcohol was prohibited during the 20th century. How many people are in prison for non-violent drug related issues? How many more people have to die? This issue won't go away with the arrival of more military force. The real long term solutions to this problem is beyond the limited discourse now taking place within the Mexican government. I seriously doubt that the U.S. government is capable of actually doing anything to remedy this situation. Poverty in both Mexico and the U.S. breeds drug trafficking. Drug prohibition breeds conflict. Most people that choose to use drugs see this as a personal choice. Due to the individualistic nature of capitalism, present in both societies, choice, consumption, and the open market are all intrinsic to the way people reason their involvement within this dynamic. The law is only as good as it is accepted by the majority of a people of a society. When law exceeds realistic application, repression becomes the standardized norm; if you repress something long enough it becomes very powerful; moreover, it surely doesn't go away. This violence we are seeing is the result various facets of repression: economic, educational, and legal.
Getting back to the issue of choice, people will choose to use because consumption is at the nature of what America and Mexico have become. Mexico's economy itself is run by cartels-economic under the guise of free trade. The micro Mexican economy is predominantly Laizze-Faire and social Darwinistic. The businessman who has capital and power succeeds, the weaker one cedes to the stronger. Getting back to the poverty, because of the unemployment and depression that exists, people need a feel good mechanism. Some have found it in drugs, others in money. Do you really thing that the human being is totally capable of being content with failure and exploitation? I don't.
The death of Armando Rodriguez is a sad tragedy, and his killers should be brought to justice. The people that killed him represent a fascism that is equal to that of the Nazi party of the 1930's and 1940's. The sad connection is that the determinants that enabled the Nazi's to control Germany are similar to those found presently in Mexico: the combination of poverty and ignorance.
Yet we must ask ourselves how guilty we all are for letting the conditions persist that enabled this in the first place? Every time we criticize the government for not doing enough, we place the blame upon an assumed institution. We forget too easily that these institutions are made up of people with their own values, motives, and particulars. Like us, yet not like us, these people have the power to do something, but they can only do so much. This is where the issue of gun ownership comes into question.
There is an old saying: "there is never a cop around when you need one." Yea, so what, we are always around within ourselves. However, to come out of self and actually seek a solution to the problems that caused tragic incident will ultimately involve coming out of the way we have been socially conditioned to see the solutions to these types of problems. The dilemma rests within society, while the solutions to it rest within our ability to change that society.
Ken G
November 14, 2008
The narco cartels rule Cd. Juarez, our close neighbor. North-South border traffic has been reduced to a trickle. There is next to nothing that we can do on this side of the border. The Mexican bad-guys take advantage of Mexican law that denies weapons to honest people but is unable to take on the wellarmed narcos.
Juan Arturo Muro
November 15, 2008
I like what both "licensiado" and "your consciousness" remarked about the state of being in J. I also agree with what "jack" said, but I have to add that even if the Mexican population had the right to bear arms, most people would still have a mentality that would render them iincapable or unlikely to get together, ambush the bad guys and pull the trigger.
Even with firearms in the hands of a normal person (one not in law enforcement or in serious criminal activity), it takes a lot effort, intestinal fortitude, and moral decisiveness to point, face an adversary and pull the trigger with the intent to maim or kill--even when one's life is in danger.
Once armed, normal citizens still need proper training in aiming and shooting the weapon with precision, studying the laws, hypothetical situations involving firearms, and legal consequences of using it on another human being.
Furthermore, a deep, soul-searching, spiritual episode must happen so that each person arrives to a prepared decision of how he or she will react when that split-second moment of self-defense occurs and the adrenaline grabs hold of your terrified body when the other guy is pointing a gun at you and is shooting.
Right now, the citizenry is frozen and they resemble sheep while the wolves are out there, roaming freely and picking apart anything they want with their rows of dagger-like, fine-pointed teeth.
I feel the only way the citizenry will take back their streets is when each household will be asked to pay "protection" money for living in the neighborhood block! Yes! The situation is moving towards that nefarious direction.
When it eventually comes to that point, I feel the people will finally make a united stand against the extortioners, terrorists, drug-dealers, and other like-minded criminals even if the defenders are armed only armed with shanks, ice-picks, kitchen knives, chains, tire irons, shovels, scissors, sharpened sticks, loose bricks and half-empty socks filled with two pairs of "D" sized batteries.
rachel showery
November 16, 2008
nothing to say...Juan Arturo Muro said it all.
it never seems to ease up
sl
November 16, 2008
The ramifications of an average citizen fataly wounding one of the bad guys would land him or her in a mexican prison if not dead, and for once you would see the police and military actually doing there job and arresting that indivisual.
It's sad, but true, Juarez is a war zone and the innocent are not afraid to shoot, but are aware of the consequences and the damage it could create for their loved ones.
Furthermore, It's my opinion, that inorder to initiate a comprehensive plan to assist Mexico in this drug war, it would require buy in from the mexican government. I just don't see that happening anytime in the near future, because corruption, lawlessness, and years of greed apprear to be the priority, not the mexican people...
sherpeace
November 17, 2008
We need to do something about these killings as well as the killings of the Women of Juarez! There are hundreds of US companies there taking advantage of a cheap, unending labor pool. Are we sure they are not involved? We need to insist they tell the police and the local and national govt. that they are going to leave if they don't find out the REAL murderers. They need to insist that they let the innocent people out of jail.
WE NEED TO TELL THEM THAT WE WILL BOYCOTT THEIR PRODUCTS IF THEY DON'T DO SOMETHING AND ANNOUNCE IT TO THE PRESS.