The guilty plea entered last November by 80-year-old Carlos Villa Cordova, a former El Paso school trustee known to many as “Coach,” to a single charge that included taking bribes was a sad surprise to those who knew and had worked with him for years.
Last month, on orders of Federal District Judge Frank Montalvo, a redacted version of the transcript of the closed court hearing at which he entered his plea was made public.
It was one of the eight carefully and extensively edited transcripts of the closed hearings of the seven defendants who pleaded guilty after the first defendant, John Travis Ketner, the former chief of staff to County Judge Anthony Cobos, did so in June 2007.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Debra Kanof asked Montalvo to release the redacted transcripts last month, as part of a motion her office filed in response to the lawsuit Newspaper Tree and El Paso Media Group.
Newspaper Tree and Media Group sued to intervene in the public corruption cases in August to gain access to future court hearings and to transcripts, court documents and other documents that Montalvo had sealed, some at Kanof’s request.
With many important details edited out, Cordova’s transcript still contains some interesting details of what he admitted to doing and how he was handled by Montalvo and the U.S. attorney’s office in court.
The rest of the transcript with the statements laying out how the schemes transpired and who bribed Cordova for exactly what reason has been replaced by lines of capital Xs, some long, some with a few letters, and will probably remain that way until after Cordova is finally sentenced.
It looks like this series of statements by Assistant U.S. Attorney Debra Kanof in Montalvo’s closed court on Nov. 28, 2007 regarding the charge:
“It alleges just one count and the county is a conspiracy count. But it alleges that the conspiracy had three legal objectives. One was wire fraud, another was mail fraud, and the other was the deprivation of the right to your honest services. Basically, what it is saying is that with regard to XXX … XXX that he gave you cash.
THE DEFENDANT: Yes
MS. KANOF: And that the cash was in exchange for your vote and for basically talking XXXX up and supporting XXXX and being a friend to XXX … XXX.
“And as a result of that, you did vote to support XXXXXXXXXX. In this particular instance, though, to your benefit there, was no loss XXX … XXX the El Paso Independent School District.”
Cordova, a former school teacher and coach, served two stints of four years each on the El Paso school board and was known throughout the district as Coach Cordova.
The district even named a school after him, but in the middle of a passage containing 10 redacted lines in the transcript of his hearing is this from Kanof:
“XXX … he wishes for his named to be removed from Cordova Middle School, XXX …”
Kanof read the brief factual basis for Cordova’s guilty plea at the closed hearing and what is not redacted reveals that his illegal dealings go back to his first term in 1995.
He admits taking cash from individuals and not reporting that money as campaign contributions in exchange for “supporting and voting in favor of XXX …”
“Specifically,” it goes on, “the defendant accepted cash money from XXX … XXX and others.
“The defendant did not report these monies as campaign contributions. These cash bribes were provided to defendant Cordova for his support and vote in his official capacity as an EPISD trustee in securing XXX …”
The documents states that someone – a company or an individual – began paying Cordova bribes amounting to $3,000 and that he received a total of $5,000.
“On Feb. 15 of 2007, while under surveillance by agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, XXXXXX met the defendant at Carlos & Mickey’s Restaurant … where he handed the defendant a white envelope containing $500 in cash as part of the continuing agreement for the defendant to vote for XXX …”
The factual basis reveals some of what has gone on in the investigation, which would be no surprise to anyone who watches TV cop shows.
It states at one point that FBI agents “engaged the assistance of various cooperating witnesses and co-conspirators who agreed to wear a concealed audio recorder while speaking to other targets of the investigation.
“Conversations were recorded between the defendant and a cooperator – or multiple cooperators on Jan. 23, 2007, and on Feb. 7 – 15 of 2007.”
It also describes how a cooperator assured Cordova that he would continue to help him.
“The cooperator explained that ‘help’ meant cash bribes,” the document states.
As he did at all of the guilty plea hearings, Montalvo delivered some personal words of advice to Cordova, but his comments to the elder man were different from the others:
“Mr. Cordova, let me say something to you, sir, before I let you go today. You have an opportunity to redeem yourself and to have a peaceful death, to go to your grave with a clear conscience.
“You have that opportunity in front of you now.”
Montalvo then explained the terms of Cordova’s release on a $10,000 signature bond and on relatively unrestricted terms, except that travel to Mexico was barred.
***
To reach David Crowder, write to dcrowder@epmediagroup. or call (915) 351-0605
Related Documents:















ballwasher
November 7, 2008
I wonder if I pled guilty to RIPPING OFF THE TAXPAYER a judge would be trying to console me? What the hell kind of crap is this?
No redemption is possible. He violated the trust of the community and the children he was supposed to serve and protect. Nothing can erase that....nothing.
How "Coach" could preen himself to the community as some sort of positive example shows he had no honor. Collecting 5K in bribes showed how low rent he was.
I wish him nothing but the worst in what little future he has left. It's a crying shame this judge appears unlikely to puinish this dirtbag with prison time.
2 thumbs down ...one for the "ROACH" and one for "your dishonor".
ACV
November 7, 2008
ballwasher,
Please be apprpriate concerning this issue. Please give this man grief and forgiveness, for we are all not that perfect. Mr. Cordova is rightfully being punished for wrong doing, nor is he denying it. I assure you, Mr. Cordova did not have evil intentions.
Ken
November 7, 2008
So ACV, he gets a pass because he is old? Give me a break, he knew what he ws doing and had everyone, including me fooled. I thought Coach was just an old guy past his prime that people respected due to his past accomplishments. Turns out he knew exactly what he was doing. The shame is that he was willing to "work" so cheap.
MR CK
November 7, 2008
I think that the operative word her is redemption. Coach Cordova was given the chance to ask for forgiveness and admit his wrongdoings. In return for his confession and admission of wrongdoing, he would be given some leniency. I would not be surprised if the Federal Prosecutor could not have charged him with more counts and more related crimes. He was given a door to walk thru if he had remorse. I think the Federal Prosecutor showed her humanity towards an elderly person who was caught red handed. I do not believe that we as a community would be proud if Coach Cordova blew his brains out over his disgrace. It will be interesting when the names that were XXX'ed come out.
DJ
November 7, 2008
That Cordova was only charged with one count for $5000 is what really surprises me. This is just the tip of the iceberg no doubt.
I attended multiple EPISD board meetings over many years where "Coach" either nodded off or lost his place on what agenda item was being discussed. When he woke up, he jumped vocally into the conversation with praise for XXXXXXX and his company XXXXXXXX, unaware that he was discussing the wrong agenda item.
Other Board members would look around and giggle with embarrassment, while the District employees who knew what was going on would just hold their heads down in shame at the whole corrupt process.
It's on the tapes, go look for yourself. He's not the only one on the Board who regularly made motions to instruct the Purchasing Department to award million dollar contracts to someone other than the lowest responsible bidder or winner of the contract competitions, often with the excuse that "they are a local company" when no such requirement existed.
My only question is when does XXXXXXXXXXX get indicted?
nojustice
November 7, 2008
ACV,
What punishment? He hasnt been in jail. He was told “Mr. Cordova, let me say something to you, sir, before I let you go today. You have an opportunity to redeem yourself and to have a peaceful death, to go to your grave with a clear conscience."
I pray that poor old Mr. Cordova can withstand that blistering admonishment from the Judge. What a freaking JOKE!
Rey
November 8, 2008
This story is truly a pathetic example of the internal influence peddling , back scratching and corrupting influence that Lobbist have involved themselves in for years.
Is it unique to El Paso, of course not. I hope that this article is read elsewhere. Your communities are not untouched.
On the point of how the Judge is treating this person, I don't agree. Whether he is 80,60,50 or 30. He needs to face the same justice. Is the Judge engaged in a fishing expedition, who knows. However, the prosecution must push forward with documenting a solid case against the "XXXX". Our Justice system isn't set up to rehabilitate but rather protect our Society based upon the laws in place.
The Harm done by this trustee must be investigate, prosecuted, and the "XXX" must pay as well.
In such a property poor community, it's just unacceptable to award expensive and unecessary spending contracts to unethical and crooked vendors.
(For only $5k???)
Is this the tip of the iceberg? Perhaps!
Jerry Kurtyka
November 8, 2008
While I am grateful for Obama's clear victory, the thing a Democrat administration might do is to derail this overall corruption investigation by the FBI. It is not inconceivable to imagine local influential Dems asking the new AG to, "Get your dogs out of our backyard."
Getting all these thugs out of office and into jail is the number one thing that will improve this community's reputation and long term potential. I wonder what the HUD audits on HACEP will reveal?
In my City Hall duty tour, I did encounter stories of outside investors being subject to a shakedown as a condition of doing business here. It doesn't take long for investors to realize that a community does not have a level playing field. There are plenty of other towns where they can spend their money that are level.
ACV
November 10, 2008
ballwasher,
I can understand why you would be angry, but I never contended that he she get a decent walk because he is a senior. Although it is dishonorable, I believe that the punishment of actually recognizing his personal crime speaks to the situation.
ballwasher
November 10, 2008
ACV,
Let me get this straight....run for office by preening to be a leader..someone of integrity. Then violate that trust by stabbing little kids in the heart by ripping them off via fraud. The fair punishment is a guilty plea and the judge doing his best to make you feel better about yourself? No jail time?
That is exactly why this community is in the mess that it is. Violation of the public trust is no big deal...routine...par for the course. Nobody here expects an honest government. Nobody here cares about ethics.
Look at recent history. Barbara Perez preened herself as a taxpayer advocate. As soon as she was out of office...A FOR SALE SIGN was printed across her forehead. She became a lobbyist for Big League Dreams. Let me ask you. Why did they hire her? Because she is so smart? Heck no, they hired her for her connections. Let me ask you this...do you think it is in the realm of possibility that elected officials take it easy on vendors knowing that they may be possible employers once their political career ends? What she did smacked of arrogance. Same for Pat Haggerty who everyone here seems to love. The guy loses his seat and BINGO time to become a lobbyist. Time to cash in on all those connections made while he was "serving the community". My question is...are any of these people really serving us...or just serving themselves?
I find it interesting that these "lawmakers" are the ones who make having 20 pounds of smack in your trunk while crossing the bridge a mandatory jail crime....while violating the public trust is no big deal. This is a complete joke.
I would love it if I had the time to visit the courthouse to see all the guilty plea crowd at their sentencing hearings. I'd spit on each one of them. They deserve our scorn and ridicule. Nobody forced them to run for public office or be in a position of public trust. They put themselves there by pretending to be something they are not....meaning honest...trustworthy and honorable. I don't feel sorry for their families either. They will be blubbering IF they get jail time. Of course it was all golden when everyone who wanted to do business with the taxpayer was kissing their asses. Kind of like the babe in the woods routine the wives of narcos like to do.
I think that Judge Montalvo has been far too nice in his comments. These people do not deserve our sympathy or pity. Most..if not all...of them have been citizens of privilege who have abused the very public they professed to serve.
Jai Tanner
November 11, 2008
David,
I followed your career at The Times and am pleased to see you at NPT. NPT continues to grow and become a viable alternative. I appreciate the efforts put into this story.